The National Awards are meant to celebrate the best of Indian cinema ā the craft, the courage, the stories that stick. But this year? It felt more like a highlight reel of political appeasement and PR deals. Honestly, you couldnāt make this up if you tried.
I wasnāt even planning to post about this award fiasco. I really wasnāt. But then came the relentless, over-the-top hype for Aadujeevitham ā and I just couldnāt take it anymore. Sometimes silence feels like complicity, and this yearās winners? Deserved a loud, unfiltered reaction.
š„ The Kerala Story: Now with Best Director?! Seriously?
What. The. Hell. š¤£
This was one of the most tone-deaf portrayals of a Malayali girl Iāve seen in a long time. The acting was flat, the accent was laughable, and the entire representation of Kerala was borderline caricature. That painfully fake “South Indian” accent ā Bollywood still doesnāt get it. And yet this is what wins Best Director?
For a subject that deserved nuance, depth, and cultural authenticity, we got cringe. This was a missed opportunity on every level. They couldāve easily cast a true Malayali actress who actually understands the lived experience ā or at the very least, worked with a diction coach. Instead, they delivered a performance that felt more like an SNL spoof than a serious film.
Awarding it for direction just rubs salt into the wound. If this was āvision,ā Iād rather be blind.
š The Supporting Actor Drama: Sour Grapes Are Not Awards
The ongoing outrage about the Supporting Actor category is baffling. This category exists to honour talent beyond the lead. Some of the most iconic performances in Indian cinema have come from supporting roles ā the friend, the sibling, the mother, the antagonist.
Veteran actors complaining about the existence of the category entirely? Thatās not wisdom. Thatās ego talking. And it sounds awfully like sour grapes when the spotlight doesnāt shine on you.
š SRK and the Jawan Award: Better Late Than Never?
Yes, I love Shah Rukh Khan. And no, Jawan was not a performance that deserved the National Award. But hereās the thing ā he shouldāve received it for Swades years ago. Or even Chak De India. The man carried an entire generation of Indian cinema on his shoulders. So maybe, just maybe, the jury was making up for lost time.
Still, if this is a lifetime achievement disguised as a performance award, letās just be honest about it.
š« Aadujeevitham: All PR, No Punch
Aadujeevitham got hyped to the moon and back ā long shoot schedules, desert survival stories, drastic weight loss, emotional drama. But the final product? Meh. There wasnāt a single person I know who came out of the theatre raving about it. Just because something is physically difficult to shoot doesnāt make it emotionally powerful.
And Prithviraj? Heās talented, yes. But when you try to peddle your personal politics and then expect universal applause, thatās not courage ā thatās arrogance. He got completely snubbed this award season, and frankly, Iām okay with that.
š Bhagavanth Kesari: Who Were You Trying to Please?
And to add to the absurdity ā Bhagvanth Kesari wins an award. For what, exactly? Unintentional comedy? If the jury really wanted to confuse us, congratulations. Mission accomplished. At this point, Iām bracing myself for Housefull 5 to win for āBest Representation of Modern Indian Masculinityā next year. š
š Final Thoughts
This yearās National Awards didnāt feel like a celebration of Indian cinema. They felt like a boardroom deal ā where awards were handed out like party favours. But hereās the thing: audiences today arenāt blind. We know when weāre being manipulated. We can smell the politics behind the packaging.
You can try to dress it up as merit, but mediocrity in a tuxedo is still mediocrity.
Letās hope next year brings back integrity.
And please ā for the love of authenticity ā hire a diction coach.
Leave a comment